Re: US Abuse of EPWs Investigation to Go Public
Date: April 29, 2004
"Court
Martial In Iraq
April 28, 2004
Last month, the U.S. Army announced 17 soldiers in Iraq, including a brigadier
general, had been removed from duty after charges of mistreating Iraqi prisoners.
But the details of what happened have been kept secret, until now.
It turns out photographs surfaced showing American soldiers abusing and humiliating
Iraqis being held at a prison near Baghdad. The Army investigated, and issued
a scathing report.
Now, an Army general and her command staff may face the end of long military
careers. And six soldiers are facing court martial in Iraq -- and possible prison
time.
Correspondent Dan Rather talks to one of those soldiers. And, for the first
time, 60 Minutes II will show some of the pictures that led to the Army investigation.
According to the U.S. Army, one Iraqi prisoner was told to stand on a box with
his head covered, wires attached to his hands. He was told that if he fell off
the box, he would be electrocuted.
It was this picture, and dozens of others, that prompted an investigation by
the U.S. Army. On Tuesday, 60 Minutes II asked Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, deputy
director of coalition operations in Iraq, what went wrong.
“Frankly, I think all of us are disappointed by the actions of the few,”
says Kimmitt. “Every day, we love our soldiers, but frankly, some days
we're not always proud of our soldiers."
For decades under Saddam Hussein, many prisoners who were taken to the Abu Ghraib
prison never came out. It was the centerpiece of Saddam’s empire of fear,
and those prisoners who did make it out told nightmarish tales of torture beyond
imagining and executions without reason.
60 Minutes II talked about the prison and shared pictures of what Americans
did there with two men who have extensive interrogation experience: Former Marine
Lt. Col. Bill Cowan and former CIA Bureau Chief Bob Baer.
"I visited Abu Ghraib a couple of days after it was liberated. It was the
most awful sight I've ever seen. I said, ‘If there's ever a reason to
get rid of Saddam Hussein, it's because of Abu Ghraib,'” says Baer. “There
were bodies that were eaten by dogs, torture. You know, electrodes coming out
of the walls. It was an awful place."
"We went into Iraq to stop things like this from happening, and indeed,
here they are happening under our tutelage,” says Cowan.
It was American soldiers serving as military police at Abu Ghraib who took these
pictures. The investigation started when one soldier got them from a friend,
and gave them to his commanders. 60 Minutes II has a dozen of these pictures,
and there are many more pictures that show Americans, men and women in
military uniforms, posing with naked Iraqi prisoners.
There are shots of the prisoners stacked in a pyramid, one with a slur written
on his skin in English.
In some, the male prisoners are positioned to simulate sex with each other.
And in most of the pictures, the Americans are laughing, posing, pointing, or
giving the camera a thumbs-up.
60 Minutes II was only able to contact one of the soldiers facing charges. But
the Army says they are all in Iraq, awaiting court martial.
"What can the Army say specifically to Iraqis and others who are going
to see this and take it personally," Rather asked Kimmitt, in an interview
conducted by satellite from Baghdad.
"The first thing I’d say is we’re appalled as well. These
are our fellow soldiers. These are the people we work with every day, and they
represent us. They wear the same uniform as us, and they let their fellow soldiers
down,” says Kimmitt.
“Our soldiers could be taken prisoner as well. And we expect our soldiers
to be treated well by the adversary, by the enemy. And if we can't hold ourselves
up as an example of how to treat people with dignity and respect … We
can't ask that other nations to that to our soldiers as well."
“So what would I tell the people of Iraq? This is wrong. This is reprehensible.
But this is not representative of the 150,000 soldiers that are over here,”
adds Kimmitt. “I'd say the same thing to the American people... Don't
judge your army based on the actions of a few."
One of the soldiers facing court martial is Army Reserve Staff Sgt. Chip Frederick.
Frederick is charged with maltreatment for allegedly participating in and setting
up a photo, and for posing in a photograph by sitting on top of a detainee.
He is charged with an indecent act for observing one scene. He is also charged
with assault for allegedly striking detainees and ordering detainees
to strike each other.
60 Minutes II talked with him by phone from Baghdad, where he is awaiting court
martial.
Frederick told us he will plead not guilty, claiming the way the Army was running
the prison led to the abuse of prisoners.
“We had no support, no training whatsoever. And I kept asking my chain
of command for certain things...like rules and regulations,” says Frederick.
“And it just wasn't happening."
Six months before he faced a court martial, Frederick sent home a video diary
of his trip across the country. Frederick, a reservist, said he was proud to
serve in Iraq. He seemed particularly well-suited for the job at Abu Ghraib.
He’s a corrections officer at a Virginia prison, whose warden described
Frederick to us as “one of the best.”
Frederick says Americans came into the prison: “We had military intelligence,
we had all kinds of other government agencies, FBI, CIA ... All those that I
didn't even know or recognize."
Frederick's letters and email messages home also offer clues to problems at
the prison. He wrote that he was helping the interrogators:
"Military intelligence has encouraged and told us 'Great job.' "
"They usually don't allow others to watch them interrogate. But since they
like the way I run the prison, they have made an exception."
"We help getting them to talk with the way we handle them. ... We've had
a very high rate with our style of getting them to break. They usually end up
breaking within hours."
According to the Army’s own investigation, that’s what was happening.
The Army found that interrogators asked reservists working in the prison to
prepare the Iraqi detainees, physically and mentally, for questioning.
“What, if any actions, are being taken against the interrogators?
"I hope the investigation is including not only the people who committed
the crimes, but some of the people that might have encouraged these crimes as
well,” says Kimmitt. “Because they certainly share some level of
responsibility as well."
But so far, none of the interrogators at Abu Ghraib are facing criminal charges.
In fact, a number of them are civilians, and military law doesn’t apply
to them.
One of the civilian interrogators at Abu Ghraib was questioned by the Army,
and he told investigators he had "broken several tables during interrogations,
unintentionally," while trying to "fear up" prisoners. He denied
hurting anyone.
In our phone conversation, 60 Minutes II asked Frederick whether he had seen
any prisoners beaten.
“I saw things. We had to use force sometimes to get the inmates to cooperate,
just like our rules of engagement said,” says Frederick. “We learned
a little bit of Arabic, basic commands. And they didn't want to listen, so sometimes,
you would just give them a little nudge or something like that just to get them
to cooperate so we could get the mission accomplished."
Attorney Gary Myers and a judge advocate in Iraq are defending Frederick. They
say he should never have been charged, because of the failure of his commanders
to provide proper training and standards.
"The elixir of power, the elixir of believing that you're helping the CIA,
for God's sake, when you're from a small town in Virginia, that's intoxicating,”
says Myers. “And so, good guys sometimes do things believing that they
are being of assistance and helping a just cause. ... And helping people they
view as important."
Frederick says he didn't see a copy of the Geneva Convention rules for handling
prisoners of war until after he was charged.
The Army investigation confirms that soldiers at Abu Ghraib were not trained
at all in Geneva Convention rules. And most were reservists, part-time soldiers
who didn't get the kind of specialized prisoner of war training given to regular
Army members.
Frederick also says there were far too few soldiers there for the number of
prisoners: “There was, when I left, there was over 900. And there was
only five soldiers, plus two non-commissioned officers, in charge for those
900 -- over 900 inmates."
Rather asked Kimmitt about understaffing. "That doesn't condone individual
acts of criminal behavior no matter how tired we are. No matter how stretched
we are, that doesn't give us license and it doesn't give us the authority to
break the law,” says Kimmitt.
“That may have been a contributing factor, but at the end of the day,
this is probably more about leadership, supervision, setting standards, abiding
by the Army values and understanding what's right, and having the guts to say
what's right.”
Brig. Gen. Janice Karpinsky ran Abu Ghraib for the Army. She was also in charge
of three other Army prison facilities that housed thousands of Iraqi inmates.
The Army investigation determined that her lack of leadership and clear standards
led to problems system wide. Karpinski talked with 60 Minutes’ Steve
Kroft last October at Abu Ghraib, before any of this came out.
"This is international standards,” said Karpinski. “It's the
best care available in a prison facility."
But the Army investigation found serious problems behind the scenes. The Army
has photographs that show a detainee with wires attached to his genitals. Another
shows a dog attacking an Iraqi prisoner. Frederick said that dogs were “used
for intimidation factors.”
Part of the Army's own investigation is a statement from an Iraqi detainee who
charges a translator - hired to work at the prison - with raping a male juvenile
prisoner: "They covered all the doors with sheets. I heard the screaming.
...and the female soldier was taking pictures."
There is also a picture of an Iraqi man who appears to be dead -- and badly
beaten.
"It's reprehensible that anybody would be taking a picture of that situation,”
says Kimmitt.
But what about the situation itself?
“I don't know the facts surrounding what caused the bruising and the bleeding,”
says Kimmitt. “If that is also one of the charges being brought against
the soldiers, that too is absolutely unacceptable and completely outside of
what we expect of our soldiers and our guards at the prisons."
Is there any indication that similar actions may have happened at other prisons?
“I'd like to sit here and say that these are the only prisoner abuse cases
that we're aware of, but we know that there have been some other ones since
we've been here in Iraq,” says Kimmitt.
When Saddam ran Abu Ghraib prison, Iraqis were too afraid to come ask for information
on their family members.
When 60 Minutes II was there last month, hundreds had gathered outside the gates,
worried about what is going on inside.
"We will be paid back for this. These people at some point will be let
out,” says Cowan. “Their families are gonna know. Their friends
are gonna know."
This is a hard story to have to tell when Americans are fighting and dying in
Iraq. And for Cowan, it’s a personal issue. His son is an infantry soldier
serving in Iraq for the last four months.
Rather asked Cowan what he would say to "that person who is sitting in
their living room and saying, ‘I wish they wouldn't do this. It's undermining
our troops and they shouldn't do it.’"
"If we don't tell this story, these kinds of things will continue. And
we'll end up getting paid back 100 or 1,000 times over,” says Cowan. “Americans
want to be proud of each and everything that our servicemen and women do in
Iraq. We wanna be proud. We know they're working hard. None of us, now, later,
before or during this conflict, should wanna let incidents like this just pass."
Kimmitt says the Army will not let what happened at Abu Ghraib just pass. What
does he think is the most important thing for Americans to know about what has
happened?
"I think two things. No. 1, this is a small minority of the military, and
No. 2, they need to understand that is not the Army,” says Kimmitt. “The
Army is a values-based organization. We live by our values. Some of our soldiers
every day die by our values, and these acts that you see in these pictures may
reflect the actions of individuals, but by God, it doesn't reflect my army."
Two weeks ago, 60 Minutes II received an appeal from the Defense Department,
and eventually from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Richard
Myers, to delay this broadcast -- given the danger and tension on the ground
in Iraq.
60 Minutes II decided to honor that request, while pressing for the Defense
Department to add its perspective to the incidents at Abu Ghraib prison. This
week, with the photos beginning to circulate elsewhere, and with other journalists
about to publish their versions of the story, the Defense Department agreed
to cooperate in our report.
© MMIV, CBS Worldwide Inc. "
Peruse More InterNetwork Notices
Peruse Older InterNetwork Notices
DISCLAIMER:
The content of this message is the sole responsibility of the originator.
Posting of this message to the POW-MIA InterNetwork© does not show AII
POW-MIA endorsement. It is provided so you may make an informed decision.
AIIPOWMIAI is not associated in any capacity with any United States Government
agency or entity, nor with any non-governmental or private organization.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, any copyrighted
work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for nonprofit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
]
Archive ©AII POW-MIA