Re: Vets Search for Australia's 6 MIAs
Date: April 24, 2004
"Transcript
This is a transcript from The World Today. The program is broadcast around Australia
at 12:10pm on ABC Local Radio.
You can also listen to the story in REAL AUDIO and WINDOWS MEDIA formats.
Vietnam vets campaign to find remains of missing soldiers
The World Today - Friday, 23 April , 2004 12:39:00
Reporter: Rachel Carbonell
TANYA NOLAN: As we prepare to remember those who served in the world's wars,
this weekend, it'll be another especially painful ANZAC Day for the families
and friends of six Australians still listed as missing since the Vietnam War.
Lance Corporal Parker is missing and presumed dead, and Private Gillson believed
to have been killed in action in November 1965
Private Fisher is presumed dead after falling from a helicopter during an evacuation
in 1969.
Flying Officer Herbert and Pilot Officer Carver never returned from a bombing
mission in 1970.
Lance Corporal Gillespie was in a helicopter accident in 1971 and is presumed
dead.
A campaign has been launched to have the men's body's recovered or for the Australian
Defence Force to officially state that they're not recoverable.
Using their own resources, the group has been conducting its own investigation
into where the bodies may be, and it's accused the Australian military of doing
nothing to help them.
Retired Lieutenant Colonel Jim Bourke was the commander of the 1st Battalion
of the Royal Australian Regiment which Parker and Gillson served in, in 1965.
He spoke to Rachel Carbonell in Melbourne.
JIM BOURKE: Basically, at this stage, we've produced reports on four of the
six cases and forward those reports to the Government. Unfortunately, the Government
doesn't want to know about it.
RACHEL CARBONELL: What exactly is it that you want the Australian Defence Force
or the Government to do?
JIM BOURKE: Basically what we're looking for is full accounting for these six
men who were either killed in action, bodies not recovered, or missing in action,
presumed dead, from the Vietnam War. By full accounting what we mean is that
they either recover identifiable remains, or give us conclusive evidence, sustainable
evidence that such remains are not available.
RACHEL CARBONELL: Why is that so important?
JIM BOURKE: It's just an ethic of a soldier that you don't leave your mates
behind basically. Also, I think from the point of view of the families it would
be nice to know that they fully accounted… that these men were fully
accounted for. They may not even wish to recover the remains from wherever they
are found. They may be prepared to leave them rest in peace. But I don't think
it's the family's responsibility to push the Government for full accounting,
it's simply a moral responsibility towards the soldier.
RACHEL CARBONELL: The six men are missing in action and presumed dead for a
variety of reasons; one of them was swinging from helicopter after being rescued
from a hostile situation. Is what you're asking for realistic?
JIM BOURKE: Oh yes, I do believe it's realistic. The Americans do exactly this
for their people, and they've managed to recover approximately 20 per cent of
those people who were missing at the end of the Vietnam War. You can do it.
But if you haven't got the will, or the interest, or if you think it's impossible,
forget it.
RACHEL CARBONELL: Is this something that the Australian Defence Force has done
adequately in other situations, do you think?
JIM BOURKE: The Australian Defence Force has got a policy which I consider to
be rather parochial and fitted better to the 18th Century. Their policy says
that they will recover the remains of an Australian serviceman, provided that
we can identify those remains as being those of an Australian serviceman. Now
that's a little bit short-sighted in my humble opinion. You really need to investigate
the cases, the loss incidents, the intervening years and find out where perhaps
these remains might be, so that you can actually go and pick them up according
to the current policy that the Defence Force has.
RACHEL CARBONELL: So do you think then that there also needs to be a change
in the Australian Defence Force's policy on these issues?
JIM BOURKE: Undoubtedly, and that's what we're on about. We're asking for full
accounting, not just picking up remains once they've been found by somebody
else.
TANYA NOLAN: Retired Lieutenant Colonel Jim Bourke with Rachel Carbonell.
And in a statement to The World Today, the Defence Department says that it cannot
begin to consider initiating action until the remains have been located, and
there is strong circumstantial or definite evidence that they are the remains
of ADF personnel.
The ADF says any action it takes then would depend on the circumstances, including
the wishes of the family.
©2004 ABC
Australian Broadcasting Corp."
Peruse More InterNetwork Notices
Peruse Older InterNetwork Notices
DISCLAIMER:
The content of this message is the sole responsibility of the originator.
Posting of this message to the POW-MIA InterNetwork© does not show AII
POW-MIA endorsement. It is provided so you may make an informed decision.
AIIPOWMIAI is not associated in any capacity with any United States Government
agency or entity, nor with any non-governmental or private organization.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, any copyrighted
work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for nonprofit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
]
Archive ©AII POW-MIA