| News-Info-Alerts |
Re: Former POWs Turned Away By Supreme Court
From: POW-MIA InterNetwork
Date: October 06, 2003
"High Court Rejects WWII POW Labor Case
By ANNE GEARAN
Associated Press Writer
October 6, 2003
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court turned aside appeals from former American prisoners of war and others who claim they were forced to work for private Japanese companies as slave laborers during World War II.
The court's action, taken without comment Monday, ends lawsuits in California against Japanese firms or their successors that allegedly forced prisoners to work in mines, dig roads and perform other duties more than 50 years ago.
Japanese conglomerates now known as Mitsui, Mitsubishi, Nippon Steel and others survived the war in part by using slave labor, and then thrived in the postwar industrial boom, lawyers for former prisoners claimed.
"The perversity of the mistreatment of these men -- outside the laws, customs and conventions of war which all civilizes nations were and are now obligated to honor -- will always remain a dark shadow over the history of the 20th century," lawyers for former U.S. prisoner Lester I. Tenney told the court.
A federal appeals court dismissed the claims earlier this year. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said treaties signed by the United States barred prisoners from seeking restitution.
That ruling said federal power to make foreign policy overrode a 1999 state law in California that gave survivors and ex-POWs the power to sue.
Lawyers for the Japanese companies noted that the treaty ending the war in the Pacific specifically noted that Japan would be unable to pay reparations for all damage and suffering during the war. Under the treaty, Japan agreed to pay the allies about $4 billion in reparations.
Lawyers for the Japanese firms also said the lawsuits are effectively moot, because the Supreme Court has already struck down a similar California law meant to help Holocaust survivors recover insurance benefits.
Lawyers for aging veterans made an emotional appeal to the high court, which represented the last hope for resurrecting their claims.
"Having suffered unspeakable abuse in 1942-1945, the youngest of the survivors is nearly 80," the appeal said. "These men represent the finest of the generation that fought and won the Second World War, incurring enormous personal loss to preserve our way of life against severe and imminent threats."
The high court also rejected similar arguments from Filipino, Korean and Chinese nationals forced to work for Japanese companies during World War II.
The cases are Tenney v. Mitsui Co. Ltd., 02-1776; Saldajeno v. Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha Ltd., 02-1784; Oh v. Nippon Steel Co. Ltd. 02-1773; Ma v. Kajima Corp., 02-1778.
Copyright © 2003, The Associated Press "
Peruse More InterNetwork Notices
Peruse Older InterNetwork Notices
DISCLAIMER: The content of this message is the sole responsibility of the originator. Posting of this message to the POW-MIA InterNetwork© does not show AII POW-MIA endorsement. It is provided so you may make an informed decision. AIIPOWMIAI is not associated in any capacity with any United States Government agency or entity, nor with any non-governmental or private organization.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]
AII POW-MIA does not endorse any offsite material, organization or individual. For information purposes only.
The opinions expressed on this site are those of
Advocacy and Intelligence Index for Prisoners of War - Missing in Action.
If you have any questions or comments, please e-mail us at the above address.
Archive ©AII POW-MIA